<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Electronic Cigarette &#38; E-Cigarettes by Instead &#187; njoy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.e-cig.org/tag/njoy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.e-cig.org</link>
	<description>Electronic Cigarette Blog and Store</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:45:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Legal Battle Over Electronic Cigarette Continues</title>
		<link>http://www.e-cig.org/2010/02/10/the-legal-battle-over-electronic-cigarette-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.e-cig.org/2010/02/10/the-legal-battle-over-electronic-cigarette-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Instead E-Cigarettes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Fight With The FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judge leon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[njoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking everywhere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e-cig.org/?p=1325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is a continuation of our &#8220;What is Going on with the FDA and the Electronic Cigarette?&#8221; blog post from May 1st, 2009. So what is going on now? Well, as we noted, Judge Leon granted a preliminary injunction to the electronic cigarette suppliers until the case is resolved. This meant that the FDA [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.e-cig.org/2010/02/10/the-legal-battle-over-electronic-cigarette-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientific Testing Verifies Electronic Cigarette Vapor Does Not Contain Carcinogenic TSNAs</title>
		<link>http://www.e-cig.org/2010/01/13/scientific-testing-verifies-electronic-cigarette-vapor-does-not-contain-carcinogenic-tsnas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.e-cig.org/2010/01/13/scientific-testing-verifies-electronic-cigarette-vapor-does-not-contain-carcinogenic-tsnas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 18:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Instead E-Cigarettes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Cigarette Testing & Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[njoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSNA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e-cig.org/?p=1249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Testing done by ANALYZE Inc, a premier independent consulting laboratory has determined that the vapor produced from the electronic cigarettes they tested do not contain any detectable levels of carcinogenic TSNAs. They tested electronic cigarettes marketed by NJoy and found that &#8220;there is no evidence that carcinogenic TSNAs are present in the aerosol&#8221;. This is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.e-cig.org/2010/01/13/scientific-testing-verifies-electronic-cigarette-vapor-does-not-contain-carcinogenic-tsnas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electronic Cigarette Smokers Weigh In on FDA Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.e-cig.org/2009/09/10/electronic-cigarette-smokers-weigh-in-on-fda-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.e-cig.org/2009/09/10/electronic-cigarette-smokers-weigh-in-on-fda-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 02:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Instead E-Cigarettes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Fight With The FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[njoy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smoking everywhere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e-cig.org/?p=956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday, September 10, 2009, an ad-hoc group of electronic cigarette users, calling themselves the Alliance of Electronic Smokers, filed an amicus brief in the litigation against the FDA by two electronic cigarette suppliers. Here is the information regarding their brief: MOTION OF ALLIANCE OF ELECTRONIC SMOKERS FOR LEAVE TO PARTICIPATE AND FILE BRIEF AS [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.e-cig.org/2009/09/10/electronic-cigarette-smokers-weigh-in-on-fda-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technical Review and Analysis of FDA Report: “Evaluation of e-cigarettes”</title>
		<link>http://www.e-cig.org/2009/08/08/technical-review-and-analysis-of-fda-report-%e2%80%9cevaluation-of-e-cigarettes%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.e-cig.org/2009/08/08/technical-review-and-analysis-of-fda-report-%e2%80%9cevaluation-of-e-cigarettes%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 20:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Instead E-Cigarettes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Cigarette Testing & Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fight With The FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[njoy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e-cig.org/?p=859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is the summary of the Technical Review and Analysis of FDA Report: “Evaluation of e-cigarettes”. The review of the now infamous FDA report on electronic cigarettes was done by: Janci Chunn Lindsay, Ph.D. Exponent Health Sciences Toxicology and Mechanistic Biology Division 10850 Richmond Ave. Suite 175 Houston, TX 77042 July 30, 2009 It was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.e-cig.org/2009/08/08/technical-review-and-analysis-of-fda-report-%e2%80%9cevaluation-of-e-cigarettes%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NJoy Response To FDA Conference Call Regarding Electronic Cigarettes</title>
		<link>http://www.e-cig.org/2009/07/24/njoy-response-to-fda-conference-call-regarding-electronic-cigarettes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.e-cig.org/2009/07/24/njoy-response-to-fda-conference-call-regarding-electronic-cigarettes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Instead E-Cigarettes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Fight With The FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[njoy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.e-cig.org/?p=728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ON BEHALF OF NJOY, CEO Jack Leadbeater July 23, 2009 NJOY RESPONSE TO FDA CONFERENCE CALL NJOY’s products have been on the market since at least April 2007 with no reports of significant adverse health consequences. We do not market our products to children, and indeed take affirmative steps to ensure that our products are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.e-cig.org/2009/07/24/njoy-response-to-fda-conference-call-regarding-electronic-cigarettes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 4/13 queries in 0.054 seconds using disk

Served from: www.e-cig.org @ 2010-09-10 18:45:04 -->